NATO Clinical Death: Why ruSSian Attacks Continue

Two weeks have passed since the brazen act of aggression by the ruZZians against Poland. Everyone has already said everything they could, and now it’s time for conclusions. My conclusions are grim, and they point to one reality: NATO Clinical Death is no longer a metaphor but a fact.

One: NATO is in a state of clinical death and is utterly unprepared for ruZZian aggression. On paper it lives, the bureaucracy hums, officials shout headlines, but actions = zero. In practical terms it’s in a coma.
Two: The United States, with its statements and actions, is openly encouraging ruZZians to continue aggression against Europe.
Three: European countries are not preparing for the inevitable ruZZian aggression with its new forms and tools. As always, they’re preparing for the previous war.

Article 5 That Never Happened

The invasion of dozens of UAVs from Belarusian territory into Poland, flying hundreds of kilometers deep, is an act of aggression. Period. And Polish officials themselves called it exactly that in their official statements. And as many observers noted, Poland — during its behind-closed-doors consultations with NATO leadership and allies — demanded the invocation of NATO’s Article 5. NATO members, led by the US, politely sent Poland to a place everyone understands. Poland had to settle for invoking Article 4.

Article 4 means consultations when member states believe their territorial integrity, political independence, or security are threatened. Unlike Article 5: according to it, an armed attack against one NATO member is considered an attack against all, and each ally is obliged to take measures — including armed force. As we saw, Polish and other NATO forces themselves used arms to shoot down the ruZZian UAVs. That fact alone proves there was aggression; it was repelled with force.

Washington’s Reaction and NATO Clinical Death

Article 4 is irrelevant in this case. Yet the U.S., followed by NATO leadership, refused to see aggression. President Trump shrugged it off: “things happen, the world is like this now.” Secretary of State Rubio declared loudly that it was a mistake. The drones got lost. Oh, and those Polish SIM cards and extra fuel tanks? Pure accident.

At the same time, the US lifted sanctions from Belavia, Belarus’s airline. The same Belarus whose territory served for this aggression against Poland. If that is not direct encouragement for ruZZian escalation, then what is?

To me it looks simple: the U.S. is giving the green light to ruZZians for more aggression against Poland and other European NATO states.
Why the U.S. acts like this toward its “allies,” I don’t know. Maybe for today’s U.S. leadership, EU and NATO countries are no longer allies. That’s the new reality, and we must accept it.

Poland’s Unpreparedness and Green Light for Aggression

And now, a few words about Poland’s readiness for attack — which I consider inevitable. I won’t lecture NATO — there are no troops in NATO, only a bureaucracy of officials.

Let’s talk about Poland. It has a Ministry of Defense, a General Staff, a Security Council, and other bodies in charge of borders and security, with the President at the top. The task of the General Staff is to be ready for aggression, to have protocols ready for hostile soldiers or hostile hardware — piloted or remote-controlled — crossing the border. A full-scale war has been raging nearly four years already, a drone war for three years.

Open statistics show that drones now account for roughly 75% of effects on manpower and equipment among the invaders.
The enemy Drones are the main strike force terrorizing our towns and villages today.
The core task of the Polish General Staff should be learning the enemy’s tactics and building countermeasures. Moscow is the identified main foe.

But what did we see? No structures, no tools, no will to counter hostile drones. There’s no will because no Polish general or high official has been removed for failing to repel the aggression.

What Poland and NATO Really Need

I’m not here to give advice to Poles, not my business. But my opinion is this: only the creation of a real no-fly zone over southern and western Ukraine — enforced by the armed forces of Romania, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, in close cooperation with the AFU — will give them the understanding and practice of modern air warfare. It will also give them the courage to test their national tools of aerial combat. All the other exercises, trainings, conferences and meetings are just military masturbation: they waste time and resources.

Why Further Aggression Is Inevitable

Why do I believe more aggression against EU and NATO countries is inevitable? Because such aggression serves the orcs’ main task — destroying Ukraine.

The U.S. has refused to provide armed assistance to Ukraine, and I see no prospect of that changing. Key word: assistance. Don’t confuse that with “permission to buy weapons.” Europe now provides 80% of aid. Canada, Japan, Australia help too, but the core is Europe. Forcing Europe to abandon Ukraine would solve all of Moscow’s problems. And it’s clear: Ukraine won’t hold without money and weapons.

To stop European aid, Europe must be frightened. No need for tanks or massed ruZZians infantry charges. The toolbox is broad: aerial drones; naval drones; underwater drones; ground drones; RCIEDs and jamming; airport, telecom and power disruptions; cyberattacks on banks, airports and civilian infrastructure; sabotage of ammo and UAV depots; Plus massive info-attacks making it clear: “This is because you help Ukraine.”

Hybrid War Against Europe

Look at Israel and Iran — they showed the world how to fight almost exclusively with aerial assets. Orcs can, and will, apply the same method to Europe. RuZZians are copying it against Europe already. Escalation is step by step: ruZZians drones into Poland, then into Romania, then MiG-31s over Estonia, then  drones over Denmark.

Sustained and targeted campaigns like this will push more and more citizens in these countries to openly oppose aid to Ukraine and focus on their own safety. They will bargain with the invaders at Ukraine’s expense — exactly what right-wing parties propose. The shifting Polish mood toward Ukraine is a clear example.

The Coming Hybrid Offensive

When I speak of inevitable attacks on European countries, I don’t mean tank wedges or mass infantry assaults. I mean constant, systemic threats to everyday European life via hybrid methods. And the slogan of these attacks will be: “Abandon Ukraine, be friends with ruZZians, or you and your children will never be safe again.”

NATO has no theory for stopping this. In fact, what we’re seeing is NATO Clinical Death: not even the political will to admit these are attacks, just excuses about “accidents” or “mistakes.”