Putin Lies About NATO Attack as He Lied About Ukraine

Yesterday’s speeches by Pootin show the liar in all his unappealing appearance. Moreover, some of what this long-deranged citizen of the swamps said confuses even the most rabid war supporters and corners their propaganda. They clearly remember what they wrote referring to Pootin’s statements, yet now, quoting him, they become direct accomplices to outright lies. Once again, Putin lies about NATO attack, repeating false claims just as he did when he used the pretext of a NATO threat to justify the 2022 invasion of Ukraine — the recent detention of the Kival tanker only confirms yet another of his fabrications.

The Same Lies, Different Target

Yesterday, Pootin talked about how Europe artificially stirs up the topic about Russia’s desire to attack European countries. He called this outright nonsense and said only those who themselves want to escalate the situation in Europe can say such things. But he said exactly the same about warnings the US, Great Britain, and NATO provided to Ukraine on the eve of full-scale invasion.
As we remember, Pootin himself, his Lavrov, Peskov, and other scum used exactly such expressions to convince the world they had nothing of the sort in mind. Everyone who said otherwise provoked situation escalation, they claimed.

January 2022, Pootin:

Russia threatens no one

February 17, 2022, Lavrov (Foreign Minister on the Swamps):

Russia repeatedly stated it has no aggressive intentions toward Ukraine

February 20, 2022, Peskov (Khuilo’s press secretary):

Russia is the last country in Europe that wants to utter the word “war”

Déjà Vu: They Said This Before

They said this at the moment when their own troops already finished concentration near Ukraine’s borders and moved to deployment stage. This means military forces had corresponding offensive plans and were provided with everything for conducting it. Moreover, a significant part of the northern grouping of Russian troops had strike direction from Belarusian region of Russia territory. This means Belarus leadership was fully informed about the offensive start date. At precisely this time, Pootin and his pack delivered exactly such speeches.

At minimum, Finland and Estonia have already repeatedly stated that orcs conduct active military construction near their borders. Moreover, it has very suspicious character — expansion of logistics capabilities done before planned offensive. The “West-2025” exercises conducted on Belarusian region of Russia territory and Kaliningrad enclave very much resembled in structure what happened before full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

NATO’s Countermove

However, NATO deployed its counter-exercises and started transferring troops directly to Suwalki corridor, considered the most likely direction of first strike. Surprisingly, an American aircraft carrier entered Oslo port. As we know, American carriers never travel alone. Usually a naval grouping accompanies them, carrying several hundred missiles of various classes onboard. So the risk proved too great, and “exercises” had to end. Though the exercise legend included tactical nuclear weapons use, meant to deter NATO troops’ retaliatory strikes.

But again, the bastards conducted “exercises” in Belarus and on their territory near our borders also in several waves until they dared invasion. So here the analogy is practically complete. Putin lies about NATO attack using the same rhetoric, indicating attack plans are already approved. Right now they’re simply choosing the moment to move to terminal preparation phase.
To see this analogy, it’s enough to review enemy press from January-February 2022 and pay attention to Pootin’s statements and those of the persons mentioned above. The analogy will prove so accurate that failing to notice it is only possible deliberately.

The Tanker That Exposes Everything

The story with the tanker detained in France proved even more revealing. Near French port Saint-Nazaire on the English Channel coast, authorities detained a suspicious tanker that already changed its name several times — Pushpa, Kiwala, and now known as Boracay. They detained it for two reasons.

First — according to French and European intelligence services, the vessel belongs to Pootin’s shadow fleet. Second — this ship’s route and timing near Denmark and Germany coasts coincided with unauthorized drone use, which blocked several airports’ operations.

As soon as the vessel went along French coast, local authorities didn’t wait for drone incidents and detained it near Saint-Nazaire. Characteristically, after its detention, no more drone incidents occurred. According to French press, the ship’s captain and first mate refused to cooperate with French authorities who began vessel inspection. Therefore, they got arrested to stand trial in February.

Macron’s Measured Response vs. Putin’s Self-Exposure

Local press reached President Macron for explanations about this incident’s essence and its connection to drone events. France’s president responded measured and carefully:

I’m very cautious because our services and justice continue working… I don’t exclude this at all, but I can’t yet clearly establish and confirm the connection between these two phenomena.

Simply put, Macron makes no unfounded statements, leaving corresponding structures to establish all circumstances that led to vessel detention. At the same time, he didn’t exclude precisely those versions currently circulating in press.

Against this background, what the führer said yesterday about this is very revealing. Answering the same question, he called the detention “piracy” and an attempt to provoke Moscow to aggressive actions. He stated there couldn’t be drones aboard the tanker and that he doesn’t know how connected the vessel is to Russia.

Putin Lies About NATO Attack — The Pattern Is Clear

The Kremlin führer simply cannot know what grounds French authorities had for detaining the vessel. Therefore, there are no grounds for calling this piracy. Moreover, in one answer he stated two mutually exclusive things:

1 – If you know nothing about this vessel’s connection to your country, how can this cause your “aggressive actions”?

2 – A foreign vessel, to whose fate you have no relation, shouldn’t interest you at all. But here — not just responsive actions, but “provoke aggressive actions.”

But that’s not all. Pootin stated there couldn’t be drones aboard the vessel. Where does such confidence about an unknown vessel’s contents come from? In short, the old man ages and exposes himself literally within one speech.

On the other hand, Pootin has always been a vile and hypocritical liar. There are no reasons to believe this will change in old age. Putin lies about NATO attack exactly as he lied about Ukraine attack. The pattern repeats. Europe must not ignore the warnings this time.